NDA 2025
- Exam
- NDA
- Year
- 2025
- Subject
- Mathematics
- Chapter
- Application of Derivatives
NDA 2025 · Mathematics · Application of Derivatives
Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The function f(x) =...
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: The function has a minimum value 48 at .
Statement-II: As increases through 4, changes sign from positive to negative.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-I: The function has a minimum value 48 at .
Statement-II: As increases through 4, changes sign from positive to negative.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Options
- ABoth Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- BBoth Statement-I and Statement-II are correct but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- CStatement-I is correct but Statement-II is not correct
- DStatement-I is not correct but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer
C. Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is not correct
Step-by-step solution
Given
Differentiating with respect to , we get:
For critical points,
At ,
Now, checking the sign of around :
For , (negative)
For , (positive)
Since changes sign from negative to positive as increases through , is a point of local minimum. The minimum value is .
Thus, Statement-I is correct.
Statement-II claims that changes sign from positive to negative, which is incorrect.
Therefore, Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is not correct.
Answer: Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is not correct
Differentiating with respect to , we get:
For critical points,
At ,
Now, checking the sign of around :
For , (negative)
For , (positive)
Since changes sign from negative to positive as increases through , is a point of local minimum. The minimum value is .
Thus, Statement-I is correct.
Statement-II claims that changes sign from positive to negative, which is incorrect.
Therefore, Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is not correct.
Answer: Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is not correct