NEETChemistryIonic Equilibrium
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): According to Ostwald's dilution law, the degree of ionization of a weak electrolyte is inversely proportional to the square root of its concentration. Reason (R): When a 0.1 ~M solution of a weak acid is diluted to 0.01 ~M , its degree of ionization ( ) increases. In the light of the above statemen
Options
- ABoth Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
- BBoth Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion.
- CAssertion is true but Reason is false.
- DAssertion is false but Reason is true.
Correct answer
B. Both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion.
Step-by-step solution
Assertion (A) is true because Ostwald's dilution law states that for a weak electrolyte, the degree of ionization = K_ a C , which means 1 C . Reason (R) is also true because as concentration decreases from 0.1 ~M to 0.01 ~M (dilution), the degree of ionization increases. However, Reason (R) is merely a specific observation or consequence of Ostwald's dilution law, not its explanation. The law itself is derived from the equilibrium constant expression. Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is no